layout-head
TweakForce VIPs
Make donations with PayPal!

©
VIP Members

Modules
· Home
· AvantGo
· Donations
· Downloads
· Forums
· Internet Traffic Report
· Private Messages
· Search
· SpeedTest
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Top10 Downloads
· 1: Xtreme-G 182.06m XP32
· 2: Xtreme-G 177.92 XP 32bit
· 3: Xtreme-G 182.06m Vista32
· 4: Xtreme-G 182.08 XP32
· 5: Xtreme-G 185.81 XP32
· 6: Xtreme-G 190.62m Win7/Vista32
· 7: Xtreme-G 195.62 Win7/Vista64
· 8: XG 11.2 Mobility Win7 Vista 64bit
· 9: Xtreme-G 195.62 XP32
· 10: Xtreme-G 190.62m Win7/Vista64

Google Ads

Google
 Forum FAQ  •  Search  •  Memberlist  •  Usergroups   •  Register  •  Profile  •  Log in to check your private messages  •  Log in

BULLDOZER REVIEWS WERE DOCTORED, LOOK AT THIS!!! SHITZ ON I7

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TweakForce Forum Index -> Open Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Desi_Doubkle
Hardcore Member
Hardcore Member


Joined: Aug 30, 2007
Posts: 389
Location: Fort Anandpur, Khalistan

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:38 pm    Post subject: BULLDOZER REVIEWS WERE DOCTORED, LOOK AT THIS!!! SHITZ ON I7 Reply with quote

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/315775-10-asus-crosshair-giving-biased-results-bulldozer

Shocked
_________________
Processor: i5 2500k @ 4.5ghz 1.24v
Vid: 7970 @ 1160/1650
Mobo: Gig p67a-ud4-b3
RAVEN 3 case
PSU: Ultra 750w (Tier 2 brand :s for model)


Processor: Fx-4300 (stock)
mobo: biostar ta-970 (excellent board)
HDD: Seagate Barracuda 500gb & 120gb muskin (60gb inferno failed)
RAM: 8gb G Skill 1333 @ 7-7-7-20
PSU: CM Silent Pro 850 Watt
GPU: 560 ti @ stock
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fir3ball
Hardcore Member
Hardcore Member


Joined: Jun 22, 2011
Posts: 258

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 11:43 pm    Post subject: Re: BULLDOZER REVIEWS WERE DOCTORED, LOOK AT THIS!!! SHITZ O Reply with quote

Desi_Doubkle wrote:
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/315775-10-asus-crosshair-giving-biased-results-bulldozer

Shocked
i7 shits on bulldozer in multithreading CineBench, Adobe Photoshop, SIsoft sandra, Media Encoding, Music Encoding, PCmark 7 those benches are pure proccesing power on the games they where using ati hardware which is optimize with amd fx cpu's still not a huge difference compare to 2600k the problem is they where testing games that is optimize wit ati hardware for example shogun 2 which is optimize wit ATI and the games they test where limited and i7 its also faster on SATA 6 gbs, also faster in PCI e testing all in all i7 shits on bulldozer on almost all benches. so the i7 2600k still wins. heres the link where they think bulldozer was faster on other reviewer sites since they where using the press kits.

http://www.hardwareheaven.com/reviews/1285/pg6/amd-fx-8150-black-edition-8-core-processor-vs-core-i7-2600k-review-cpu-performance.html
_________________
i7 5960x @ 4.4 @ 1.25v
Corsair H105 Push/Pull Set Up
Gigabyte X99 Gaming 5
Corsair Vengeance 16 GB OC @ 3000 (16-18-18-39-2T) 1.35v
3x EVGA SC GTX 980 in Tri-Sli
Samsung 840 PRO 256 GB O.S/Programs
Samsung 840 PRO 256 GB Games
EVGA Supernova 1300 Watts
SoundBlaster ZX
Corsair 760T
Turtle Beach XP 510
Samsung S27D590P AD-PLS Panel
Corsair Vengeance M65 Mouse
Corsair Vengeance MM200 Gaming Pad
Corsair Vengeance K70 Cherry Blue Swith Keyboard/Red L.E.D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GeekGuy
Donator
Donator


Joined: Nov 08, 2008
Posts: 317
Location: Florida, USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah I don't buy it. The same kits were send by AMD themselves. I seriously doubt that they would have selected the components in that kit if they were giving crap performance. There are some discrepancies in the benchmarks from site to site, but that always happens. Of course, look at the launch of the first Phenom- they did find a bug that was fixed with a BIOS update that helped performance, but still not enough to make it competitive. I really hope there is some magic fix to make AMD look better, but I don't think it will happen.
_________________
CPU: Intel Core i5-3570k
Cooler: Xigmatek Gaia
Mainboard: ASRock Z77 Professional
Memory: 16GB Mushkin DDR3-1600
Case: Silverstone FT02-BW
Graphics: Galaxy GTX680
Power: Corsair HX850
Sound: Soundblaster Titanium HD X-Fi w/ FiiO E9 & V-Moda M100
Storage: Crucial M4 128GB, 3TB Seagate HDD
Monitor: Dell U2711; Alienware AW2310
HID: CM Trigger; Razer Deathadder BE
OS: Windows 8.1 Pro x64
Current Driver: 332.21 WHQL
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nurface
Hardcore Member
Hardcore Member


Joined: Aug 19, 2007
Posts: 225
Location: Brooklyn Center, MN

PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm at the point of who cares with AMD for quite some time. I mean Sandy Bridge cpu are fast on all accounts and affordable for even a buget build under $600.
_________________
Processor:Intel i7 CPU 4790K @ 4.00GHz
Memory:AMD Radeon AG316G2130U2K 16GIG
Hard Drive:PLEXTOR PX-AG256M6e ATA Device
Video Card:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Sli
Monitor:Tempest X270OC
Sound Card:Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D /Headphones:Sennheiser G4ME Zero
Keyboard:Logitech G19
Mouse:Roccat Kone XTD
Mouse Surface: Razer Mantis
Operating System:Windows 7 64bit Motherboard:Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming GT
Computer Case:Corsair 730T
PSU PC Power & Cooling Silencer Mk III Series 1200W
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
am
Hardcore Member
Hardcore Member


Joined: Aug 15, 2007
Posts: 488

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AMD spent months and months trying to squeeze every bit of performance out of BD and which I am sure had a lot to do with the delays. Its inconceivable to me, that unbeknownst to them, another mobo would give better performance. They know every minute circuit in the chipsets and parts that interface with BD and what would improve or hamper its performance. They chose and packaged the Crosshair with CPUs for reviewers. If results show otherwise on other mobos, and can be reproducible under the same conditions, clocks, mem frequencies, settings, etc on other boards, then it would indicate a momentous blunder on AMDs part. They would then contact all the reviewers and inform them that there has been a major fuck up, and to please redo the reviews with the other, better boards. So far AMD hasnt uttered a peep on this. So its very unlikely that these were sham or doctored reviews. AMD even responded to the negative reviews but never mentioned a thing about better performance of other boards.

http://blogs.amd.com/play/2011/10/13/our-take-on-amd-fx/
_________________
i5-3570k | Asrock Z77 Pro 4 | 8gb DDR3 1600 GSkill | MSI TF GTX 770 | Creative SB-Zx | Samsung SA27950D | XFX Pro 750w | Win7x64
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TweakForce Forum Index -> Open Forum All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Forums ©
layout-foot
K륧ëR§ö§ë & §ëMPëRFï are your WebAdmins
Special Thanks To 1337Hardware,
For Providing Server Technology & Deployment.
"Unlimited" Support And Services Provided By:http://KeyPromptLLC.com