TweakForce VIPs
Make donations with PayPal!

VIP Members

· Home
· AvantGo
· Donations
· Downloads
· Forums
· Internet Traffic Report
· Private Messages
· Search
· SpeedTest
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Top10 Downloads
· 1: Xtreme-G 182.06m XP32
· 2: Xtreme-G 177.92 XP 32bit
· 3: Xtreme-G 182.06m Vista32
· 4: Xtreme-G 182.08 XP32
· 5: Xtreme-G 185.81 XP32
· 6: Xtreme-G 190.62m Win7/Vista32
· 7: Xtreme-G 195.62 Win7/Vista64
· 8: Xtreme-G 195.62 XP32
· 9: XG 11.2 Mobility Win7 Vista 64bit
· 10: Xtreme-G 190.62m Win7/Vista64

Google Ads

 Forum FAQ  •  Search  •  Memberlist  •  Usergroups   •  Register  •  Profile  •  Log in to check your private messages  •  Log in


Post new topic   Reply to topic    TweakForce Forum Index -> Open Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Hardcore Member
Hardcore Member

Joined: Aug 30, 2007
Posts: 387
Location: Fort Anandpur, Khalistan

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:38 pm    Post subject: BULLDOZER REVIEWS WERE DOCTORED, LOOK AT THIS!!! SHITZ ON I7 Reply with quote

Processor: i5 2500k @ 4.5ghz 1.24v
Sound: Asus Xonar DG w/ unified driver.
Ram:Kingston Hyperx DDR3-1600 @ 9-9-9-21
Vid: 7970 @ 1160/1650
Mobo: Gig p67a-ud4-b3
Hdds: 1tb Hitachi desktar. wd caviar blue &black 320 gb RAID 0 100gb patriot inferno ssd
hsf: xspc raystorm
RAVEN 3 case
PSU: Ultra 750w (Tier 2 brand :s for model)

Processor: Phenom II x3 @ stock
mobo: cheap asus ftl, now gigabyte something
GPU: 560 ti stock
HDD: Seagate Barracuda 500gb & 120gb muskin (60gb inferno failed)
RAM: 8gb G Skill 1333 @ 7-7-7-20
Case: Raven 3
PSU: CM Silent Pro 850 Watt
HSF: Hyper 212+ 2x Blademaster
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hardcore Member
Hardcore Member

Joined: Jun 22, 2011
Posts: 248

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 11:43 pm    Post subject: Re: BULLDOZER REVIEWS WERE DOCTORED, LOOK AT THIS!!! SHITZ O Reply with quote

Desi_Doubkle wrote:

i7 shits on bulldozer in multithreading CineBench, Adobe Photoshop, SIsoft sandra, Media Encoding, Music Encoding, PCmark 7 those benches are pure proccesing power on the games they where using ati hardware which is optimize with amd fx cpu's still not a huge difference compare to 2600k the problem is they where testing games that is optimize wit ati hardware for example shogun 2 which is optimize wit ATI and the games they test where limited and i7 its also faster on SATA 6 gbs, also faster in PCI e testing all in all i7 shits on bulldozer on almost all benches. so the i7 2600k still wins. heres the link where they think bulldozer was faster on other reviewer sites since they where using the press kits.
i7 4930k @ 4.5
Corsair H100i Push/Pull Set Up
Gigabyte X79 UD3 (F18 Bios)
GSkill 16 GB Ripjaws Z 2550 Mhz (10-12-12-31-2T)
3x Gigabyte Windforce GHZ Edition GTX 780 in Tril-Sli (Core 1201/Mem 6.5 Ghz)
2x Samsung 840 PRO 256 GB in Raid 0
EVGA Supernova 1300 Watts
SoundBlaster ZX
Coolermaster Haf-X Blue Edition
Turtle Beach X42 Wireless 3D Surround 7.1
Samsung S27C750 S-MVA Panel 3000:1 Static Contrast Ratio
R.A.T 7 Gaming Mouse
Levetron Mech 5 Mechanical Keyboard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: Nov 08, 2008
Posts: 317
Location: Florida, USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah I don't buy it. The same kits were send by AMD themselves. I seriously doubt that they would have selected the components in that kit if they were giving crap performance. There are some discrepancies in the benchmarks from site to site, but that always happens. Of course, look at the launch of the first Phenom- they did find a bug that was fixed with a BIOS update that helped performance, but still not enough to make it competitive. I really hope there is some magic fix to make AMD look better, but I don't think it will happen.
CPU: Intel Core i5-3570k
Cooler: Xigmatek Gaia
Mainboard: ASRock Z77 Professional
Memory: 16GB Mushkin DDR3-1600
Case: Silverstone FT02-BW
Graphics: Galaxy GTX680
Power: Corsair HX850
Sound: Soundblaster Titanium HD X-Fi w/ FiiO E9 & V-Moda M100
Storage: Crucial M4 128GB, 3TB Seagate HDD
Monitor: Dell U2711; Alienware AW2310
HID: CM Trigger; Razer Deathadder BE
OS: Windows 8.1 Pro x64
Current Driver: 332.21 WHQL
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hardcore Member
Hardcore Member

Joined: Aug 19, 2007
Posts: 225
Location: Brooklyn Center, MN

PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm at the point of who cares with AMD for quite some time. I mean Sandy Bridge cpu are fast on all accounts and affordable for even a buget build under $600.
Processor:Intel i7 CPU 3770K @ 3.50GHz
Memory:Corsair CMX8GX3M2A2000C9 16GIG
Hard Drive: MKNSSDCR240GB-DX 2.5" 240GB x 2(RAID0)
Video Card:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Sli
Monitor:Tempest X270OC
Sound Card:Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D /Headphones:Corsair Vengeance 1400
Keyboard:Logitech G19
Mouse:Razer Imperator Mouse Surface: Razer Mantis
Operating System:Windows 7 64bit Ultimate Motherboard:Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP4-TH
Computer Case:IN WIN GRone
PSU PC Power & Cooling Silencer Mk III Series 1200W
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Hardcore Member
Hardcore Member

Joined: Aug 15, 2007
Posts: 488

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AMD spent months and months trying to squeeze every bit of performance out of BD and which I am sure had a lot to do with the delays. Its inconceivable to me, that unbeknownst to them, another mobo would give better performance. They know every minute circuit in the chipsets and parts that interface with BD and what would improve or hamper its performance. They chose and packaged the Crosshair with CPUs for reviewers. If results show otherwise on other mobos, and can be reproducible under the same conditions, clocks, mem frequencies, settings, etc on other boards, then it would indicate a momentous blunder on AMDs part. They would then contact all the reviewers and inform them that there has been a major fuck up, and to please redo the reviews with the other, better boards. So far AMD hasnt uttered a peep on this. So its very unlikely that these were sham or doctored reviews. AMD even responded to the negative reviews but never mentioned a thing about better performance of other boards.
i5-3570k | Asrock Z77 Pro 4 | 8gb DDR3 1600 GSkill | MSI TF GTX 770 | Creative SB-Zx | Samsung SA27950D | XFX Pro 750w | Win7x64
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TweakForce Forum Index -> Open Forum All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Forums ©
K륧ëR§ö§ë & §ëMPëRFï are your WebAdmins
Special Thanks To 1337Hardware,
For Providing Server Technology & Deployment.
"Unlimited" Support And Services Provided By: